DMK tries to woo Hindus but boomerangs

DMK tries to woo Hindus but boomerangs

swarajya%2F2016 05%2Fddc29a5d c877 4fdb 8c8b 9a3849c0f55c%2FGettyImages 3150672

With Hindu unity becoming more and more vocal and apparent in Tamil Nadu, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam is now caught between its anti-Hindu dogma and the necessities of real politics.

Just like the temple run of the other princeling Rahul Gandhi during the Gujarat elections in 2017, M.K.Stalin, the dynastic supremo of the DMK has decided to flaunt a pro-Hindu identity.

With elections coming in a few months, the DMK looks as if it wants to send a message that it is not an anti-Hindu party.

In a meeting at Thirunelveli, Stalin came out openly and stated this:

In the entire speech, Stalin listed various schemes that were supposedly enacted during the time of Karunanidhi and DMK rule and which allegedly benefitted the Hindu temples under the Hindu Religious and Charity Endowment Board. He also claimed that various Hindu seers praised these deeds of the DMK.

The video has gone viral and has been trolled by many in the social media.

Many Hindus may feel that this is a symbolic victory for the emerging Hindu unity in the state ahead of the elections next year.

DMK seems to be playing soft-Hindutva. Or is it?

In reality, there is an aversion to Hindu dharma and its institutions at a deeper level here.

Incidentally, when the DMK first came to power, the body of all the religious leaders in Tamil Nadu – the traditional adheenams, Jeeyars and Madathipathis, called Deivika Peravai, formed by the previous Congress government to monitor and guide government management of temples and also spread Hindu Dharma, came to be headed by Thava Thiru Kuntrakudi Adigal.

Adigal was said to be close to the DMK. He was even considered a ‘Sarkari’ Adheenam. But even he expressed his discomfort and displeasure over the allegations that the DMK government was planting its party people inside temple administration.

In his speech delivered in the Upper House of the state legislative assembly on 4 December 1973, Adigal had this advice to give to ‘our’ government, as he called the DMK administration:

Even Thava Thiru Kuntrakudi Adigal, one of the strong supporters of the DMK, was forced to not only to caution the government but have his word of caution published in the magazine of the Peravai six months later.

Such was the government interference and party nepotism in the temple (mis)administration under the DMK regime.

What Stalin probably meant in his speech was that under his father’s regime, Tamil Nadu government replaced the original Agama rituals with their Tamil translations.

Such an imposition is not only anti-Hindu but it is also against the most sublime Tamil values cherished by those who made seminal contributions to Tamil and its sacredness.

The demand to change the mode of worship inside the temple sanctums into Tamil has been more a political demand fuelled by the colonial view of Dravidians being a different ethnic, even racial, category. In this view, the presence of Sanskrit is deemed as a kind of imposition by ‘Aryans’.

But this demands the question: why did the great Saivaite Adheenams never care to replace Sanskrit with Tamil, even though their love for Tamil and their contribution to Tamil are well known?

The answer is that to them the term ‘Tamil’ itself was a spiritual term and in that definition it accommodated Sanskrit, whose essence and functional responsibility was to take the jiva towards liberation.

As colonial linguistic chauvinism started taking over the sacred veneration Hindu tradition has for Tamil, many great Tamil scholar-seers warned against this tendency.

Great seers and scholars Sri Pamban Kuamaraguru Swamigal, Thirumuruga Kripananda Vaariyar had condemned the tendency to hate or remove Sanskrit-based worship. They all had contributed more to Tamil than all the Dravidianist ideologues put together.

Pamban Swamigal categorically stated that the ritual mantras should be in Sanskrit. Varriyar Swamigal also cautioned against linguistic chauvinism in the matter of mantras.

Another great Siddhanta scholar Sabaratnam PhD explained in detail what Tamil actually meant for Saiva Siddhanta:

Thus, far from being a mere linguistic category, Tamil should be seen as an expansive sacred space accommodating Sanskrit for rituals, which in itself does not and cannot lower the sacredness of Tamil. But making politics out of it and substituting Tamil for Sanskrit actually diminishes the sacredness and greatness of Tamil.

In fact for domestic use – for personal puja, devotees who desire to do Ashtothra in Tamil, Saiva Siddhanta Kazhakam (Association for Saiva Siddhanta) had long before published small booklets and not only that, it had released even record discs performed by leading musicians.

But these were done for devotion and not because of animosity or competitive spirit towards another language. So even here Karunanidhi was not a pioneer but just a copycat with malicious intention towards Hindu temple institutions, born out of the arrogance of his power as chief minister.

In fact, anything born not out of love for the deity and spiritual sadhana, but out of pure animosity can only bring negativity and ill-effects. The same is true for this Tamil ‘mantras’ also.

During 1996-2001, Mr. TamilKudimagan who was the HR&CE minister in the then DMK government imposed the Tamil worship in the hallowed Kapaleeshwarar temple.

The devotees who heard the chants were horrified and hurt beyond belief. Among the chants were names surreptitiously introduced to hail the Chief Minister Karunanidhi and the HR&CE minister himself. This led to a strong protest from all the devotees and taken aback by the protest and its intensity, the DMK government hastily withdrew the imposition.

In fact, this is what happens when linguistic separatism and politics enter the sacred space of pujas and Agamic traditions. By unwittingly reminding Hindus of these incidents, M.K.Stalin has also given Hindus some strong reasons why they should not vote for the DMK.

Disclaimer: This is a syndicated post and published without any changes except for the headlines